| Match History (2021) | View Advanced Player Stats |
|
Mark Mims (Columbus, GA)
Male |
3.5 C 12/31/2023 |
| Estimated Dynamic Rating |
3.0525 11/15/2024 |
| Projected Year End Rating |
------ ---------- |
3.5 Rating Meter
3.0001 - 3.5000
3.0001 - 3.5000
| 2021 Mixed 18+ Season |
| League/Level | Total Matches |
Win | Loss | Tie | WPct | Total Sets |
Win | Loss | WPct | Total Games |
Win | Loss | WPct | Defaults |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mixed 18+ 7.0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 48 | 11 | 37 | 22.9 | 0 |
| Total | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 0.0 | 48 | 11 | 37 | 22.9 | 0 |
| Match Date | League | Team | Court | Partner | Opponent(s) | W/L | Result | Match | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 06/29/2021 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
Mims-CC Southern |
D2 |
Carolyn Erkins (2.99) |
Matthew Gilmer (3.40) Tiffany Davis (2.81) |
L | 6-0 6-3 |
2.78 | 2.98 |
| 05/12/2021 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
Mims-CC Southern |
D2 |
Pearlie Jenkins (3.15) |
Crystal Wilson (3.09) Mike Chancey (3.30) |
L | 6-1 7-5 |
2.92 | 3.02 |
| 05/08/2021 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
Mims-CC Southern |
D3 |
Carolyn Erkins (3.00) |
Lloyd Pease (3.25) Charles Pease (3.23) |
L | 6-1 6-1 |
2.89 | 3.03 |
| 06/29/2021 | D2 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Mims-CC Southern |
L | Wendel/Gilmer-CC Southern |
| Carolyn Erkins (2.99) | 6-0 6-3 |
Matthew Gilmer (3.40) Tiffany Davis (2.81) |
| Match: 2.78 | Rating: 2.98 |
| 05/12/2021 | D2 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Mims-CC Southern |
L | Wilson-CC Southern |
| Pearlie Jenkins (3.15) | 6-1 7-5 |
Crystal Wilson (3.09) Mike Chancey (3.30) |
| Match: 2.92 | Rating: 3.02 |
| 05/08/2021 | D3 | Mixed 18+ 7.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Mims-CC Southern |
L | Ernst-CC Southern |
| Carolyn Erkins (3.00) | 6-1 6-1 |
Lloyd Pease (3.25) Charles Pease (3.23) |
| Match: 2.89 | Rating: 3.03 |
| Glossary |
| Match | Player rating for individual match. |
| Rating | Dynamic rating after completed match. |
| NC | Match not yet calculated into rating. |
| S | Self rated or unrated player involved in match so no match rating calculated for current player. |
This site is not affiliated, endorsed, or associated by or with the USTA in any manner nor are the ratings affiliated with the NTRP rating system.
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap