Match History (2016) | View Advanced Player Stats |
Michael Detty (Rochester, NY)
Male |
3.5 1/1/2000 |
Estimated Dynamic Rating |
------ ---------- |
Projected Year End Rating |
------ ---------- |
3.5 Rating Meter
N/A
3.0001 - 3.5000
N/A
3.0001 - 3.5000
2016 Overall Season [Doubles] |
League/Level | Total Matches |
Win | Loss | Tie | WPct | Total Sets |
Win | Loss | WPct | Total Games |
Win | Loss | WPct | Defaults |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tri-Level 18+ 4.0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 0 |
Total | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 33.3 | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0 | 0 |
Match Date | League | Team | Court | Partner | Opponent(s) | W/L | Result | Match | Rating |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
07/17/2016 | Tournament NX4.0d |
Rochester Districts (Doubles) | 32 |
Patricia Danaher (-----) |
Kimberly Patterson (3.26) Pat Patterson (3.46) |
L | 6-1 6-2 |
S | ----- |
07/15/2016 | Tournament NM4.0d |
Rochester Districts (Doubles) | 32 |
Todd Barnum (-----) |
Richard Chute (-----) Michael Malcolm (-----) |
L | 6-2 6-1 |
S | ----- |
01/31/2016 | Tri-Level 18+ 4.0 |
Dyson Eastern |
D140 |
Nathaniel Foster (-----) |
Richard Pearson (-----) Christopher Pearson (-----) |
L | 4-6 6-3 1-0 |
NC | NC |
Rochester Districts (Doubles) | ||
07/17/2016 | 32 | Tournament NX4.0d |
L | ||
Patricia Danaher (-----) | 6-1 6-2 |
Kimberly Patterson (3.26) Pat Patterson (3.46) |
Match: S | Rating: ----- |
Rochester Districts (Doubles) | ||
07/15/2016 | 32 | Tournament NM4.0d |
L | ||
Todd Barnum (-----) | 6-2 6-1 |
Richard Chute (-----) Michael Malcolm (-----) |
Match: S | Rating: ----- |
01/31/2016 | D140 | Tri-Level 18+ 4.0 |
---|---|---|
Dyson Eastern |
L | Pearson Eastern |
Nathaniel Foster (-----) | 4-6 6-3 1-0 |
Richard Pearson (-----) Christopher Pearson (-----) |
Match: NC | Rating: NC |
Glossary |
Match | Player rating for individual match. |
Rating | Dynamic rating after completed match. |
NC | Match not yet calculated into rating. |
S | Self rated or unrated player involved in match so no match rating calculated for current player. |
This site is not affiliated, endorsed, or associated by or with the USTA in any manner nor are the ratings affiliated with the NTRP rating system.
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap