| Match History (2022) | View Advanced Player Stats |
|
Penny Nollette (Oakley, KS)
Female |
3.5 A 12/31/2021 |
| Estimated Dynamic Rating |
------ ---------- |
| Projected Year End Rating |
------ ---------- |
3.5 Rating Meter
N/A
3.0001 - 3.5000
N/A
3.0001 - 3.5000
| 2022 Overall Season [Doubles] |
| League/Level | Total Matches |
Win | Loss | Tie | WPct | Total Sets |
Win | Loss | WPct | Total Games |
Win | Loss | WPct | Defaults |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Combo 4.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 36 | 22 | 14 | 61.1 | 1 |
| Total | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 50.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 50.0 | 36 | 22 | 14 | 61.1 | 1 |
| Match Date | League | Team | Court | Partner | Opponent(s) | W/L | Result | Match | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/03/2022 | Combo 4.0 |
CV-Parkerson So California |
D5 |
JUDY MCLENNAN (2.74) |
Default | W | 6-0 6-0 |
S | ----- |
| 01/27/2022 | Combo 4.0 |
CV-Parkerson So California |
D5 |
Jane Peller (2.71) |
Carol Carnish (3.34) Lorrie Daube (-----) |
W | 6-0 6-1 |
3.77 | ----- |
| 01/13/2022 | Combo 4.0 |
CV-Parkerson So California |
D5 |
Jane Peller (2.71) |
Phyllis Johnson (-----) MaryLynn Murphy (3.06) |
L | 6-4 7-6 |
2.29 | ----- |
| 02/03/2022 | D5 | Combo 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| CV-Parkerson So California |
W | CV-Giacomini So California |
| JUDY MCLENNAN (2.74) | 6-0 6-0 |
Default |
| Match: S | Rating: ----- |
| 01/27/2022 | D5 | Combo 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| CV-Parkerson So California |
W | CV-Ringer So California |
| Jane Peller (2.71) | 6-0 6-1 |
Carol Carnish (3.34) Lorrie Daube (-----) |
| Match: 3.77 | Rating: ----- |
| 01/13/2022 | D5 | Combo 4.0 |
|---|---|---|
| CV-Parkerson So California |
L | CV-Giacomini So California |
| Jane Peller (2.71) | 6-4 7-6 |
Phyllis Johnson (-----) MaryLynn Murphy (3.06) |
| Match: 2.29 | Rating: ----- |
| Glossary |
| Match | Player rating for individual match. |
| Rating | Dynamic rating after completed match. |
| NC | Match not yet calculated into rating. |
| S | Self rated or unrated player involved in match so no match rating calculated for current player. |
This site is not affiliated, endorsed, or associated by or with the USTA in any manner nor are the ratings affiliated with the NTRP rating system.
Copyright © 2016-2025 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Copyright © 2016-2025 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap