| Match History (2018) | View Advanced Player Stats |
|
Rashmi Nath (Portland, OR)
Female |
3.0 C 12/31/2021 |
| Estimated Dynamic Rating |
2.5758 9/7/2024 |
| Projected Year End Rating |
------ ---------- |
3.0 Rating Meter
2.5001 - 3.0000
2.5001 - 3.0000
| Match Date | League | Team | Court | Partner | Opponent(s) | W/L | Result | Match | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/17/2018 | Tournament CW6.0d |
SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | RR |
Jill Boyce (2.47) |
Susan Elmer (2.67) Jinmi Kemple (2.56) |
W | 4-6 6-4 1-0 |
2.59 | ----- |
| 11/17/2018 | Tournament CW6.0d |
SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | RR |
Jill Boyce (2.47) |
Timothea Barnatan (3.08) Anne Daniels (2.97) |
L | 6-3 6-1 |
2.51 | ----- |
| 11/16/2018 | Tournament CW6.0d |
SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | RR |
Jill Boyce (2.47) |
Anh Nguyen (2.90) Brittany Teahan (3.16) |
L | 6-1 6-1 |
2.36 | ----- |
| 11/15/2018 | Tournament CW6.0d |
SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | RR |
Jill Boyce (2.47) |
Erin Canova (2.64) April Mayers (2.52) |
L | 6-2 6-2 |
2.24 | ----- |
| SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | ||
| 11/17/2018 | RR | Tournament CW6.0d |
| W | ||
| Jill Boyce (2.47) | 4-6 6-4 1-0 |
Susan Elmer (2.67) Jinmi Kemple (2.56) |
| Match: 2.59 | Rating: ----- | |
| SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | ||
| 11/17/2018 | RR | Tournament CW6.0d |
| L | ||
| Jill Boyce (2.47) | 6-3 6-1 |
Timothea Barnatan (3.08) Anne Daniels (2.97) |
| Match: 2.51 | Rating: ----- | |
| SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | ||
| 11/16/2018 | RR | Tournament CW6.0d |
| L | ||
| Jill Boyce (2.47) | 6-1 6-1 |
Anh Nguyen (2.90) Brittany Teahan (3.16) |
| Match: 2.36 | Rating: ----- | |
| SAC BACK TO THE FUTURE DOUBLES TOURNAMENT 2018 | ||
| 11/15/2018 | RR | Tournament CW6.0d |
| L | ||
| Jill Boyce (2.47) | 6-2 6-2 |
Erin Canova (2.64) April Mayers (2.52) |
| Match: 2.24 | Rating: ----- | |
| Glossary |
| Match | Player rating for individual match. |
| Rating | Dynamic rating after completed match. |
| NC | Match not yet calculated into rating. |
| S | Self rated or unrated player involved in match so no match rating calculated for current player. |
This site is not affiliated, endorsed, or associated by or with the USTA in any manner nor are the ratings affiliated with the NTRP rating system.
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap
Copyright © 2016-2024 TennisRecord.com All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy | Sitemap